<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Hate Letter to the Party System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackshards.com/index.php?feed=rss2&#038;p=1271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackshards.com/?p=1271</link>
	<description>Truth, Injustice, Fact, Fiction - What&#039;s the Difference?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 02:06:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://www.blackshards.com/?p=1271&#038;cpage=1#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackshards.com/wordpress/?p=1271#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t be opposed to more representative government at all.  But I think that - no matter what one&#039;s ideology, heritage, or gender - a limited time in public office would help to ensure ethical, accountable behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be opposed to more representative government at all.  But I think that &#8211; no matter what one&#8217;s ideology, heritage, or gender &#8211; a limited time in public office would help to ensure ethical, accountable behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Shards, In Your Eyes, Blinding &#187; NYC Caves to Bloomberg</title>
		<link>http://www.blackshards.com/?p=1271&#038;cpage=1#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Shards, In Your Eyes, Blinding &#187; NYC Caves to Bloomberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackshards.com/wordpress/?p=1271#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>[...] that virtually everyone should agree is a good thing.&#160; I recently wrote a bit that expresses some of my thoughts on the subject.&#160; An excerpt: Another way to get some fresh blood and increased accountability back into [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that virtually everyone should agree is a good thing.&nbsp; I recently wrote a bit that expresses some of my thoughts on the subject.&nbsp; An excerpt: Another way to get some fresh blood and increased accountability back into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DynamicUno</title>
		<link>http://www.blackshards.com/?p=1271&#038;cpage=1#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>DynamicUno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackshards.com/wordpress/?p=1271#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m honestly not certain where I stand on term limits. I agree with you in principle, and I think if I were forced to decide I&#039;d come down in favour of them. However, I can&#039;t help but think they&#039;d make that much of a difference.

What I&#039;d truly love to see is our nation making a move towards proportional representation, giving third parties a chance and making districts more truly representational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m honestly not certain where I stand on term limits. I agree with you in principle, and I think if I were forced to decide I&#8217;d come down in favour of them. However, I can&#8217;t help but think they&#8217;d make that much of a difference.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d truly love to see is our nation making a move towards proportional representation, giving third parties a chance and making districts more truly representational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://www.blackshards.com/?p=1271&#038;cpage=1#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackshards.com/wordpress/?p=1271#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure you&#039;re right about the opposition favoring term limits more.  It&#039;s still a good idea.

Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blackshards.com/wordpress/?p=407&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;something I wrote in 2002&lt;/a&gt;, when the Republicans&#039; were still dominating:  

&quot;Incumbents hate term limits, which is nearly enough to recommend them on that point alone. Their argument: their dismissal would lower the quality of government. Hah! If anything, regular, forced turnover would raise the bar considerably by infusing stale government committees with new blood.

The city of Houston has terms limits and its quality of service has not declined. The fact is that there are far more Americans qualified and capable of leading than there are positions to fill. Every country should be so lucky. The only reason to oppose term limits is a love of the corrupt, insider’s game that currently dominates the republican process.&quot;

Re Kay Bailey, I actually didn&#039;t vote because of a move and subsequent failure to re-register.  I would have voted for her, however, because &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blackshards.com/wordpress/?p=107&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I can&#039;t point to anything bad that she&#039;s done&lt;/a&gt;.

The problem with voter-imposed &quot;term limits&quot; that you&#039;re alluding to is that it&#039;s too late by that point.  The only option is to vote for the other party, something that&#039;s very likely to be ideologically unpalatable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re right about the opposition favoring term limits more.  It&#8217;s still a good idea.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.blackshards.com/wordpress/?p=407" rel="nofollow">something I wrote in 2002</a>, when the Republicans&#8217; were still dominating:  </p>
<p>&#8220;Incumbents hate term limits, which is nearly enough to recommend them on that point alone. Their argument: their dismissal would lower the quality of government. Hah! If anything, regular, forced turnover would raise the bar considerably by infusing stale government committees with new blood.</p>
<p>The city of Houston has terms limits and its quality of service has not declined. The fact is that there are far more Americans qualified and capable of leading than there are positions to fill. Every country should be so lucky. The only reason to oppose term limits is a love of the corrupt, insider’s game that currently dominates the republican process.&#8221;</p>
<p>Re Kay Bailey, I actually didn&#8217;t vote because of a move and subsequent failure to re-register.  I would have voted for her, however, because <a href="http://www.blackshards.com/wordpress/?p=107" rel="nofollow">I can&#8217;t point to anything bad that she&#8217;s done</a>.</p>
<p>The problem with voter-imposed &#8220;term limits&#8221; that you&#8217;re alluding to is that it&#8217;s too late by that point.  The only option is to vote for the other party, something that&#8217;s very likely to be ideologically unpalatable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elemming</title>
		<link>http://www.blackshards.com/?p=1271&#038;cpage=1#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>elemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackshards.com/wordpress/?p=1271#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>It is always the party out of power that wants term limits.  Did you vote against Sen. Kay Bailey H. to remind her of her promises to term limit herself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is always the party out of power that wants term limits.  Did you vote against Sen. Kay Bailey H. to remind her of her promises to term limit herself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
