Skip to content

Black Shards Press

Forgetting Past Mistakes is to Repeat Them

Menu
  • Home
  • Novels
    • Liberty First Novels – The Recognition Saga
      • Recognition Free Chapters
  • Short Stories
  • Op-Ed Blog
  • About
Menu

Darwinists Weigh in on Texas Education

Posted on March 24, 2009 by marc

Lisa Falkenberg’s commentary at the Houston Chronicle leaves no doubt that she’s in favor of teaching Texas children that Darwin’s theory about the origins of species as if it were proven, incontrovertible fact.  If only that were the case – then perhaps this tiresome debate could finally be put aside.

Darwin’s theory about our origins is just that – a theory supported by substantial evidence that is, to-date, still far from comprehensive.  Falkenberg and other Darwinists dismiss such inconvenient observations as mere trifles, ignoring the fact that by definition scientific proof is about known evidence and not about shepherding our theories past criticism.

As this debate has clearly shown there are large numbers of those who believe otherwise, including Falkenberg and Houston’s own Polimom, who says:

If the SBOE moves any further off the rails, the voting public (like me) will have to stumble out of our group lethargy and push (shove!!) back.   Hard.

Excuse me?  If Darwinists shove any harder they’ll be starting fistfights with those who dare to question Darwin’s assertion that mankind evolved from a protoplasmic slime mold.

The facts will ultimately speak for themselves.  In the interim, Darwin’s ideas about the origins of species must be taught as the theories that they are if we are to give children in this state the education they deserve. 

The purpose of the education system is to teach children the truth about the world which they are to inherit.  Presenting a theory as fact (or a fact as theory) is a poor way to do that.  Why?

  • It’s a lie and students, being expert liars themselves, see through them
  • The knowledge that their education is not based on truth demoralizes students
  • Demoralized students don’t have the desire to ask questions or to learn.  Why should they if they can’t be sure the answer they’ll be given is true?

Newtonian physics was every bit as entrenched at one point as Darwinism is today.  Yet Einstein’s work ultimately displayed Newton’s as the basis for modern physics.  Where would modern science be had Newton’s theories been brandished about as undeniable facts and Einstein and his contemporaries barred from pursuing their research by Newton’s fanboys?

Every theory has its strengths and weaknesses and these characteristics need to be evaluated objectively for what they are, both in the classroom and in our own lives. 

Categories

  • Abortion
  • Afghanistan
  • Africa
  • Age Issues
  • Agriculture
  • Book Reviews
  • Business
  • Celebrities
  • Child Care
  • Christianity
  • Cinema
  • Communism
  • Conservatism
  • Crime
  • Death Penalty
  • Democracy
  • Denmark
  • Discrimination
  • Drugs
  • Education
  • Energy
  • England
  • Environment
  • Evolution
  • Family Values
  • Finance
  • France
  • Free Speech
  • Gay Rights
  • General News
  • Gun Control
  • Health
  • Holocaust
  • Humor
  • Immigration
  • India
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • Islam
  • Israel
  • Justice
  • Korea
  • Law
  • Liberalism
  • Libertarianism
  • Literature
  • Media
  • Medicine
  • Men's Rights
  • Mexico
  • Middle East
  • Military
  • Music
  • My Tweets
  • National Security
  • Pakistan
  • Parenting
  • Personal
  • Philosophy
  • Political Correctness
  • Politics
  • Privacy
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Right to Die
  • Russia
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Science
  • Site News
  • Society
  • Space
  • Sports
  • Stupidity
  • Taxation
  • Technology
  • Term Limits
  • Terrorism
  • Texas
  • Transportation
  • Turkey
  • Unions
  • Venezuela
  • Welfare
  • Women's Rights
  • World
  • Youth

Archives

  • February 2025
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • March 2020
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • March 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • June 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • December 2002
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
© 2026 Black Shards Press | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme