Skip to content

Black Shards Press

Forgetting Past Mistakes is to Repeat Them

Menu
  • Home
  • Novels
    • Liberty First Novels – The Recognition Saga
      • Recognition Free Chapters
  • Short Stories
  • Op-Ed Blog
  • About
Menu

A Small Example of What Science is For

Posted on May 29, 2008 by marc

Following on to Claudia’s piece about the importance of scientific R&D, this article, while admittedly monkey business, illustrates the point:

Two monkeys with tiny sensors in their brains have learned to control a mechanical arm with just their thoughts, using it to reach for and grab food and even to adjust for the size and stickiness of morsels when necessary

From a technical perspective, we’re getting fairly close to being able to do something similar in humans.

Scientists expect that technology will eventually allow people with spinal cord injuries and other paralyzing conditions to gain more control over their lives.

There’s still debate over how practical this technology is and we don’t know how well humans would adapt to such implants, among other unknowns.  But it’s pretty darn cool and if you’re a person who’d be aided by such a device, potentially very helpful.

This experiment is one step farther along than previous ones, one more incremental improvement in a long series of them that may ultimately lead to insanely useful interfaces between man and machine.  These sorts of discoveries don’t come quickly or cheaply in most cases.  Many of the components of this latest device were undoubtedly intended for completely different purposes than monkey-brain-robotics, yet here we are.  Necessity may be the mother of invention, but without the fruits of R&D work to act as catalysts, need would remain barren.

Why go to the moon, Mars, or the asteroid belt?  What’s the point?  To me that’s the wrong question.  The right question is:  "Why not?"  That’s always the question, to which there are some valid negative answers.  But fundamentally science is about discovering the truth and for that reason alone should be pursued to the limits of ethics and possibility.

Knowing how things work leads to bigger and bigger discoveries and technologies, often in ways that can’t be predicted in advance.  That’s why the question "What’s it for?", while necessary to ask, shouldn’t serve as a governor on scientific inquiry. 

What’s a monkey-controlled robot-arm for?  In itself, nothing.  10 years from now, who knows?

Categories

  • Abortion
  • Afghanistan
  • Africa
  • Age Issues
  • Agriculture
  • Book Reviews
  • Business
  • Celebrities
  • Child Care
  • Christianity
  • Cinema
  • Communism
  • Conservatism
  • Crime
  • Death Penalty
  • Democracy
  • Denmark
  • Discrimination
  • Drugs
  • Education
  • Energy
  • England
  • Environment
  • Evolution
  • Family Values
  • Finance
  • France
  • Free Speech
  • Gay Rights
  • General News
  • Gun Control
  • Health
  • Holocaust
  • Humor
  • Immigration
  • India
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • Islam
  • Israel
  • Justice
  • Korea
  • Law
  • Liberalism
  • Libertarianism
  • Literature
  • Media
  • Medicine
  • Men's Rights
  • Mexico
  • Middle East
  • Military
  • Music
  • My Tweets
  • National Security
  • Pakistan
  • Parenting
  • Personal
  • Philosophy
  • Political Correctness
  • Politics
  • Privacy
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Right to Die
  • Russia
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Science
  • Site News
  • Society
  • Space
  • Sports
  • Stupidity
  • Taxation
  • Technology
  • Term Limits
  • Terrorism
  • Texas
  • Transportation
  • Turkey
  • Unions
  • Venezuela
  • Welfare
  • Women's Rights
  • World
  • Youth

Archives

  • February 2025
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • March 2020
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • March 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • June 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • December 2002
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
© 2026 Black Shards Press | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme